Everyone is waiting for the Liberal government's new budget on March 22. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has promised to run deficits in the coming years because billions will be spent on projects like infrastructure, which he predicts will create jobs and help revive the economy. There are also other economy-boosting plans such as cutting taxes for middle-income earners, which has already happened, and revamping child benefits so they help more families.
A brief overview of the current state of the economy is evidence that the country is in a slow growth period, with the exception of housing. First, the value of the loonie is dragging and clearly the Bank of Canada (BoC) does not have the power to do anything about it.
The latest rate announcement from the BoC left the overnight rate unchanged at 0.5%. One reason may be that a rate cut would continue to heat up consumer credit and housing activity and could potentially increase household debt. The average Canadian household carries $1.65 in debt for every dollar of disposable income – a record high. According to Statistics Canada consumer credit and mortgage and non-mortgage loans increased 1.2 per cent to $1.923 trillion at the end of last year. The total included $573.6 billion in consumer credit debt and $1.262 trillion in mortgage debt.
Another reason for the central bank's decision is that it believes it has done all it can to boost the economy. It's now in the hands of the federal government.
Despite a recent mini-rally, the international price of oil had dropped an additional US$20 per barrel since the Bank of Canada's last economic outlook in October. The freefall seems to be over, but we need more time to rebalance excess supply with weak global demand.
Finance Minister Bill Morneau has already predicted a deficit of 18-20 billion dollars for 2016/2017. Should we be worried about big defects? Apparently not, according to The Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, The organization has urged Prime Minister Trudeau to allow the deficit to rise to $37.9 billion, but to also take steps to get money into the hands of Canadian consumers to stimulate growth. There is a "multiplier effect" of getting more money into the hands of low and middle-income Canadians, who are more likely to spend it.
Yet, once again, the government will be relying on consumers to continue to keep the economy afloat, which it has been doing for the last two years.
The Montreal Economic Institute (MEI) has another view. It doesn't agree with the premise that increasing budget deficits could boost the economy.
"In the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, it is the OECD countries that reduced both their public spending and their revenues that succeeded in achieving the fastest average annual growth," said Mathieu Bédard, economist at the MEI. "Conversely, countries that chose to increase both their spending and their tax burdens experienced very slow growth."
However, the economy certainly needs a boost as we wait for non-energy sectors to kick in. By all accounts the manufacturing sectors in Ontario, Quebec and British Columbia are doing well. There are signs that Canada's economy is adjusting to new areas of strength in manufacturing, service and technology industries. Those companies are getting a boost from a weaker dollar, and Canada is now a magnet for tourists.
It may still take a few more years for the economy to fully recover and stimulus budgets may help in the interim by speeding up the process.
We can only wait to see what the Federal budget looks like and only time will tell if it will work.